The question of fuel has life or death implications for more and more people on a rapidly quickening timeframe. Both sides of the old argument, which seemed to either stake claims on no nukes, no oil -- or drilling everywhere there's a hint of oil and planting a lot of nuclear plants -- are no longer feasible.

It's naive to think that we can abandon large sources of fuel such as coal or abandon nuclear plants altogether and still be able to maintain even a reflection of our current lifestyles. However, without some alternative plans we may find ourselves having to make sudden adjustments that aren't as carefully thought out or orderly. Nothing would stop us cold across the national landscape as quickly as not being able to get from point A to point B or being able to heat up dinner or warm our houses.

Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Please log in, or sign up for a new, free account to read or post comments.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.